SONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF NORMAL RENAL VARIANTS IN POPULATION OF LAHORE

Authors

  • Muhammad Shafiq , Zeeshan Haider , Naveed Asad , Amjad Iqbal , Muhammad Shakeel , Imdadullah , Marwah Khadim Hussain, Fariha Naz , Kashmaila Noreen , Anila Zafar Univeristy Ultrasound Clinic Green Town Lahore, Punjab Pakistan. Author

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Congenital renal diseases consist of a variety of entities. The age of presentation and
clinical examination narrow down the differential diagnosis; however, imaging is essential for accurate diagnosis
and pretreatment planning. Ultrasound is often used for initial evaluation. To evaluate the normal renal variants
on ultrasound in population of Lahore.
METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional analytical study was conduct at university ultrasound clinic township
University of Lahore. Total sample size was 258. SPSS version 21.0 was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: Out of total number of 258 patients, 98 (38 %) were females and 160 (62%) were males, normal variants
of kidneys in which 45 (17.4 %) patients had Lobulation variant, 114 (44.1%) had column of bertin, 55
(21.3%) had dromedary hump, 23 (8.9%) had duplex collecting system and 21(8.1%) had junctional parenchymal
defect. Cross tabulation shows between gender and variant, column of bertin is most frequent variant in both
genders.
CONCLUSION: Study concluded that normal variants are commonly encountered on ultrasound imaging. In this
study the most common normal renal varient was colomn of bertine and least common was junctional parenchymal
defect. Sonography continues to occupy a central role in the evaluation and detection of different congenital
normal anatomical variants due to its advantage of rapid scanning time, lack of radiation exposure, cost effective
and easy feasibility
KEYWORDS: Ultrasound, Dromedary Hump, Column of Bertine, junctional parenchymal defect, cortical thickness,
renal length.Introduction.

References

Jain R. Sonographic Evaluation of Renal Dimensions and their Correlation with Gender, Weight, and Height in Normal Young Adults of Uttar Pradesh Region. Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology. 2016;3(2):149-54.

Sahni D, Jit I, Sodhi L. Weight and measurements of kidneys in northwest Indian adults. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association. 2001;13(6):726-32.

Jabbari M, Mollazade R, ESNA AF, Alizadeh Z. Normal renal dimensions in Iranian adults measured by ultrasound. 2016.

Singh H, Panta OB, Khanal U, Ghimire RK. Renal cortical Elastography: Normal values and variations. Journal of medical ultrasound. 2017;25(4):215-20.

Anibor E. Sonographic assessment of renal length of adults in Lagos, Nigeria. Nepalese Medical Journal. 2019;2(2):255-8.

Frimann-Dahl, J. "Normal variations of the left kidney: an anatomical and radiologic study." Acta radiologica 3 (1961): 207-216.

Lafortune, Michel, et al. "Sonography of the hypertrophied column of Bertin." American journal of roentgenology 146.1 (1986): 53-56.

Carter, A. R., et al. "The junctional parenchymal defect: a sonographic variant of renal anatomy." Radiology 154.2 (1985): 499-502.

Koratala, Abhilash, and Deepti Bhattacharya. "Kidney hump, no need to jump!." Clinical case reports 6.8 (2018): 1633-1634.

Mansoor A, Ramzan A, Chaudhary AN. Determination of best grey-scale ultrasonography parameter for assessment of renal function in chronic kidney disease. Annals of PIMS ISSN. 2016;18(15):22-27.

Hunter JA, Boon NA, Colledge NR, Walker BR. Davidson’s Principles and practice of Medicine. Churchill Livingstone. 2002.

Harmse WS.Normal variance in renal size in relation to body habitus. SA journal of radiology. 2011;15(4):12-14

Jain A, Kesarwani R, Rajan AK. NORMAL RENAL SIZE IN INDIAN CHILDREN-A SONOGRAPHIC STUDY. International Journal

of Scientific Research. 2020;9(1):16-18.

Mostbeck GH, Zontsich T, Turetschek K. Ultrasound of the kidney: obstruction and medical diseases. European radiology.

;11(10):1878-89.

Fernandes M, Lemos C, Lopes GS, Madeira E, Santos OR, Dorigo D, et al. Normal renal dimensions in a specific population. Int Braz J Urol. 2002;28(6):510-5.

Fiorentino M, Bolignano D, Tesar V, Pisano A, Van Biesen W, Tripepi G, Gesualdo L, ERA-EDTA Immunonephrology Working Group. Renal biopsy in 2015-from epidemiology to evidence-based indications. American Journal of Nephrology. 2016;43(1):1-9.

Bakker J, Olree M, Kaatee R, de Lange EE, Moons KG, Beutler JJ, Beek FJ. Renal volume measurements: accuracy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging. Radiology. 1999 Jun;211(3):623-8.

Moscardi PR, Katsoufis CP, Jahromi M, Blachman- Braun R, DeFreitas MJ, Kozakowski K, Castellan M, Labbie A, Gosalbez R, Alam A.

Prenatal renal parenchymal area as a predictor of early end-stage renal disease in children with vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. Journal of pediatric urology. 2018 Aug 1;14(4):32-34.

Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role?. Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):24-39.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

SONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF NORMAL RENAL VARIANTS IN POPULATION OF LAHORE. (2024). International Journal of Healthcare Professions, 1(1), 40-44. https://ijhp.giu.edu.pk/index.php/ijhp/article/view/13